Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

A novel technique to reconstruct the donor site by replanting thick split-thickness skin graft in situ: a randomized controlled trial

Published on Mar. 29, 2024Total Views: 462 timesTotal Downloads: 275 timesDownloadMobile

Author: WU Yin SHEN Gan HAO Chao

Affiliation: Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China

Keywords: Donor site Burns Wound repair Replantation in situ Quality of life

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202310051

Reference: Wu Y, Shen G, Hao C. A novel technique to reconstruct the donor site by replanting thick split-thickness skin graft in situ: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(3): 241-250. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202310051.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  This article presented a novel technique to reconstruct the donor site with a large sheet of thick split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in situ, and to compare the efficacy of this novel technique with that of the thin STSG.

Methods  A prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. The patients who received thick STSGs for repairing skin defects at functional sites or joint sites were enrolled, and were randomly divided into two groups. For the patients in the group A, the surgeons harvested thick STSGs that were larger than the size of the recipient sites, the extra skin was punctured and stretched to completely cover the donor site. For the patients in the group B, the surgeons harvested thick STSGs of the size of the recipient sites, their donor sites were covered with thin STSGs which were harvested from other parts of the patients. The primary outcome was the healing time of the donor sites. The secondary outcomes were scar scores, pain scores, and pruritus scores of the donor sites and the patients’ life quality scores.

Results  100 Patients were included and each group was 50 patients. The healing time of the donor sites was (12.20±1.64) days in the group A, which was markedly shorter than that in the  group B (17.24±2.14) days, P<0.001. The median healing time of group A was 12 days [95%CI(11.53, 12.47)], while the median healing time of group B was 17 days [95%CI(15.94, 18.06)], Log-rank test P<0.001. Patients in the group A had lower scar scores, pain scores, and pruritus scores than those in the group B (mean difference respectively: -4.74[95%CI(-5.09, - 4.39)]; -1.88[95%CI( -2.14, -1.62)]; -1.10[95%CI(-1.27, -0.93)]). The improvement in general health scores, mental health scores, social function scores, and vitality scores was significantly greater in group A than in the group B (mean difference respectively: 10.89[95%CI(9.22, 12.55)]; 12.54[95%CI(10.98, 14.09)]; 12.73[95%CI(10.92, 14.55)]; 11.66[95%CI(9.99, 13.34)]). The sweating functions, sebaceous gland secretion and sensation functions of donor sites in the patients from the group A were stronger than that from the group B. Patients from the group A were highly satisfied with the aesthetic appearance and functions of the donor sites. The skin quality of the donor sites of patients from the group A was significant better than that from the group B.

Conclusion  The novel technique significantly improved the postoperative quality of life of the patients.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Galicia KE, Thompson CM, Lewis AE et al. American Burn Association (ABA) Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP) and large data set analysis considerations: a practical guide to investigating clinical questions in burns via large data sets[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2023: irad049. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irad049.

2.贾晨, 屠晶佳, 华燕,等. 曲安奈德治疗瘢痕疙瘩的临床分析[J]. 中国药师, 2023, 26(12): 400-405. [Jia C, Tu JJ, Hua Y, et al. Clinical analysis of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids[J]. China Pharmacist, 2023, 26(12): 400-405.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311161.

3.Válik A, Harangozó K, Garami A, et al. Mid-term follow-up study of children undergoing autologous skin transplantation for burns[J]. Life (Basel), 2023, 13(3): 762. DOI: 10.3390/life13030762.

4.Koivuniemi R, Hakkarainen T, Kiiskinen J, et al. Clinical study of nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel dressing for skin graft donor site treatment[J]. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2020, 9(4): 199-210. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.0982.

5.Hanada M, Kadota H, Yoshida S, et al. Large-defect resurfacing: a comparison of skin graft results following sarcoma resection and traumatic injury repair[J]. Wounds, 2019, 31(7): 184-192. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31306097/.

6.刘毅. 重视供区的美容修复[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2020, 36(2): 81-84. [Liu Y. Lay emphasis on the cosmetic repair of donor site[J]. Chinese Journal of Burns and Wounds, 2020, 36(2): 81-84.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.001.

7.Asuku M, Yu TC, Yan Q, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: a systematic literature review[J]. Burns, 2021, 47(7): 1525-1546. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.014.

8.Kanapathy M, Mosahebi A. Comparative study on the donor site aesthetic outcome between epidermal graft and split-thickness skin graft[J]. Int Wound J, 2019, 16(2): 354-359. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13039.

9.Zhang Y, Qian Y, Huo K, et al. Efficacy of laser therapy for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Complement Ther Med, 2023, 74: 102945. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102945.

10.Han Y, Woo YR, Cho SH, et al. Itch and janus kinase inhibitors[J]. Acta Derm Venereol, 2023, 103: adv00869. DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v103.5346.

11.Esubalew H, Belachew A, Seid Y, et al. Health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using the 36-item short form health survey (sf-36) in central ethiopia: a multicenter study[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2024, 17: 1039-1049. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S448950.

12.Shindo S, Murota H, Seki T, et al. Effects of a moisturizer containing pseudo-ceramide and a eucalyptus extract on sweating function in adult atopic dermatitis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled left-right comparison clinical trial[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2022, 21(10): 4503-4509. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14923.

13.程丽雪, 李雅琴, 纪超, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定痤疮患者皮脂中亚油酸和角鲨烯的含量[J]. 中国美容医学, 2016, 25(12): 44-48. [Chen LX, Li YQ, Ji C, et al. Determine content of linoleic acid and squalene of acne patients sebum by HPLCs[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2016, 25(12): 44-48.] https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjMxMjI2EhF6Z21yeXh6ejIwMTYxMjAxOBoIdDloNmc5cWs%3D.

14.Zang C, Xian H, Zhang H, et al. Clinical outcomes of a novel porcine small intestinal submucosa patch for full-thickness hand skin defects: a retrospective investigation[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 50. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03531-z.

15.Legemate CM, Ooms PJ, Trommel N, et al. Patient-reported scar quality of donor-sites following split-skin grafting in burn patients: long-term results of a prospective cohort study[J]. Burns, 2021, 47(2): 315-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.12.005.

16.Brown JE, Holloway SL. An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings[J]. Int Wound J, 2018, 15(6): 1000-1009. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12967.

17.Radharaman, Kumar P, K SA, et al. The role of recruited minced skin grafting in improving the quality of healing at the donor site of split-thickness skin graft-a comparative study[J]. Burns, 2019, 45(4): 923-928. DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.018.

18.O'Reilly S, Crofton E, Brown J, et al. Use of tape for the management of hypertrophic scar development: a comprehensive review[J]. Scars Burn Heal, 2021, 7: 20595131211029206. DOI: 10.1177/20595131211029206.

19.Ault P, Plaza A, Paratz J. Scar massage for hypertrophic burns scarring-a systematic review[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(1): 24-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.006.

20.Park J, Kim SH, Lee J, et al. In vivo function of differential subsets of cutaneous dendritic cells to induce th17 immunity in intradermal candida albicans infection[J]. J Vis Exp, 2021, (173). DOI: 10.3791/62731.

21.Jansen P, Stoffels I, Klode J, et al. Postsurgical treatment of split skin graft donor sites in dermatological departments[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2018, 17(1):  22-29. DOI: 10.1177/1534734617747685.

22.Fusco P, Cofini V, Petrucci E, et al. Continuous wound infusion and local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2018, 84(5): 556-564. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12110-3.

23.陈思娇, 邬文君, 郑雅文. 术前口服复合益生菌对结直肠癌根治术后感染性并发症的预防作用 [J]. 中国药师, 2023, 26(10): 119-124. [Chen SJ, Wu WJ, Zheng YW. Preventive effects of preoperative oral probiotic complex before radical surgery for colorectal cancer on postoperative infectious complications[J]. China Pharmacist, 2023, 26(10): 119-124.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202310029.

24.Spronk I, Legemate C, Oen I, et al. Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0197507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197507.

25.郭幸沛, 訾豪, 任一鸣,等. 2019年全球腹腔感染相关细菌耐药性的疾病负担分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2023, 32(5): 489-497. [Guo XP, Zi H, Ren YM, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in intra-abdominal infections in 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2023, 32(5): 489-497.]DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202305002.

26.Wang G, Yang F, Zhou W, et al. The initiation of oxidative stress and therapeutic strategies in wound healing[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 157: 114004. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114004.